RecentChanges

2020-12-26

• 07:40 UTC (diff) Comments on ConsensusFantasy . . . . RonHaleEvans – Part of the issue above is that the CR rules are meant to be used in a number of different environments, only in some of which will players have . . .

2020-03-15

• 23:16 UTC (diff) Comments on ConsensusFantasy . . . . RonHaleEvans – I know. I can divide 2 by 3. But which are easier to remember, 67 and 33 or 70 and 30? If the players are using different dice, someone is going to . . .
• 22:00 UTC (diff) Comments on ConsensusFantasy . . . . TrevorLDavis – I think either way is fine (keep it here or move it). The other thing I noticed that you may or may not want to change is that the percentile . . .
• 21:28 UTC (diff) Comments on ConsensusFantasy . . . . RonHaleEvans – Because there has been a lot of confusion about percentile dice after I added them (and the standard d6) to Consensus Fantasy recently, and because . . .

2018-06-12

• 18:43 UTC (diff) Comments on ConsensusFantasy . . . . RonHaleEvans – That's a pretty good idea, Chaz, but I haven't watched a lot of heist films, so I'd probably bungle it even worse than Wodehouse. Doesn't matter. I'm . . .
• 18:37 UTC (diff) Comments on ConsensusFantasy . . . . Chaz – Instead of Wodehouse, use The Heist, or alternatively, Team of Specialists on a Mission. Examples in movies include Solo, The Fast and The Furious . . .
• 18:31 UTC (diff) Comments on ConsensusFantasy . . . . Chaz – Instead of Wodehouse, use The Heist, or alternatively, Team of Specialists on a Mission. Examples in movies include Solo, The Fast and The Furious . . .
• 18:24 UTC (diff) Comments on ConsensusFantasy . . . . Chaz – Instead of Wodehouse, use The Heist, or alternatively, Team of Specialists on a Mission. Examples in movies include Solo, The Fast and The Furious . . .
• 18:19 UTC (diff) Comments on ConsensusFantasy . . . . Chaz – Instead of Wodehouse, use The Heist, or alternatively, Team of Specialists on a Mission. Examples in movies include Solo, The Fast and The Furious . . .

2018-05-14

• 21:08 UTC (diff) Comments on ConsensusFantasy . . . . RonHaleEvans – Trevor, I think you're right. I'll work on it later. Even without the complications of dice rolling contests, etc., it's redundant to say that 'A' is . . .
• 18:08 UTC (diff) Comments on ConsensusFantasy . . . . TrevorLDavis – I know in the d20 system (i.e. DnD 3.0-3.5 and Pathfinder) a 1 was an automatic failure and a 20 was an automatic success but it was always a single . . .
• 17:59 UTC (diff) Comments on ConsensusFantasy . . . . TrevorLDavis – I had seen a similar mechanic in "Powered by the Apocalypse" games (i.e. success mixed with failure for certain dice roll combinations) as a way to . . .

2018-05-12

• 05:27 UTC (diff) Comments on ConsensusFantasy . . . . RonHaleEvans – OK, I went ahead and made an example (on paper) for the special rolls, and then I went back to your question and realized you were asking about . . .

2018-05-11

• 18:09 UTC (diff) Comments on ConsensusFantasy . . . . RonHaleEvans – I thought I had some text in there like "If an argument will always fail or always succeed, don't roll for it" but I see I didn't transcribe that . . .
• 05:32 UTC (diff) Comments on ConsensusFantasy . . . . TrevorLDavis – Saw that in the original Matrix rules "Stupid" arguments automatically fail (even if one rolls a 6) - in your version are "Stupid" arguments just not . . .

2018-04-30

• 03:29 UTC (diff) Comments on ConsensusFantasy . . . . RonHaleEvans – I'm happy to say Chris Engle has agreed to release his Matrix Game material under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license. I'm going to create a Matrix Games Wiki . . .

2018-03-15

• 17:07 UTC (diff) Comments on ConsensusFantasy . . . . RonHaleEvans – As I said, I'm definitely going to contact him and ask permission. His final post on his now-defunct blog implies he's liberating his work, and he . . .
• 16:49 UTC (new) Comments on ConsensusFantasy . . . . TrevorLDavis – I couldn't confirm looking online that the Engle Matrix Game system is under some kind of Free Culture License but saw that bunch of people have . . .

More...