[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [piecepack] Travel piecepacks
- To: piecepack@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [piecepack] Travel piecepacks
- From: "Michael Van Biesbrouck" <mlvanbie@...>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 23:54:56 -0700
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oDrju1fJ4ZLhTwDCZNWKyQdDcS5rv0ArYhJY4YabWIqM39fWbUzkLDQfcTm/57LP6liE/YmqIgu0MQIa08xrVAdEsRDPw8I9KIbysVHqSx5cHcx38ijna1HD/om3bjYjk9RixG9bNulPnzrxGNB0C3lS4qD9I/cDk8JHYDT4DU8=
- In-reply-to: <etnrp5+v6uc@...>
- References: <etnrp5+v6uc@...>
On 3/19/07, mschoessow <mikeschoessow@...> wrote:
It occurs to me that an optimum size for a small piecepack set is
exactly one half the standard size (i.e. tiles of 1" x 1"). There would
be a couple of advantages:
I agree with your points, except that coins are pretty tiny for 1.25"
piecepack sets.
Here's another idea. How about
???
Michael